33 Comments

Great read. More of these please! All the very best for 2025.

Expand full comment

Ok!

Expand full comment

Cool read. If the moons Galileo discovered are considered the “Galilean Moons”, why ain’t the big moons of Saturn considered “ Cassinian Moons”? 😂

Expand full comment

Maybe it's because Galileo was the first to turn a telescope upwards! It was the very consequential moment that humanity began spying on the universe. And he discovered all 4 moons at the same time. So, he really deserves that recognition. And Cassini's name is given to the division in Saturn's rings that he discovered. So, he knows we love him, too.

Expand full comment

We have such wonderful technology today- and getting better! This is a wonderful science, for both amateurs and professionals. Happy New Year, Carolyn!

Expand full comment

Thank you!

Expand full comment

Great review Carolyn! We keep learning more about our tiny part of the universe. Thank you.

Expand full comment

Thank you!

Expand full comment

Excellent! Thanks!

Expand full comment

Thank you!!

Expand full comment

What great science!!! Happy New Year Carolyn!!!

Expand full comment

Thanks, Greg! Great science indeed.

Expand full comment

Hi Carolyn. I have wondered this for years. Do Scientists assemble a Periodic Table of the Elements for each moon or planet we visit ? Would the Table on Mars and Earth be almost identical ? Thanks, Ernie.

Expand full comment

Puzzling question. The PT is the categorization of elements (ie atoms w/ different # of protons in the nucleus) based on the structure of their electron clouds. That is universal. It will be the same everywhere. (Well, maybe things get munged close to a black hole.) It has nothing to do with planets or you or me.

Expand full comment

Of course you've probably already thought about this, but could the material be from the theoretical source of Saturn's rings? I remember watching a documentary where I believe you were talking about a possible icy moon exploding as it reached Saturn's roche limit, causing its rings. Are the same elements found on Iapetus, Phoebe, etc also found in the rings? PS. I wrote a poem/song about Saturrn's Roche limit, inspired by your work. Hope you like it: https://youtu.be/GHol4WHlveM

Expand full comment

I doubt it. Iapetus is vastly more distant from Saturn than the rings. And the distribution of material wouldn't look like it does on Iapetus. It would be more uniformly distributed.

Expand full comment

Thank you Carolyn for this inspiring example of rigor curiosity and accomplishment. Hoping to see you soon.

Debbie

Expand full comment

Thanks Debbie! The 'rigor' in all that nearly killed me, but I survived to tell the tale!

Expand full comment

Fantastic. I am a little confused in some of the images about the direction of solar illumination. How far around the circumference does the ridge extend? I also love the landslide image.

Happy new year.

Expand full comment

Hi Tom! Happy New Year! The ridge extends ~110 deg in full. Which image is confusing to you?

Expand full comment

Happy New Year, Dr. Porco!

Something hilarious for you. I saw it and instantly thought of you. :)

https://www.reddit.com/r/mildlyinteresting/comments/edp992/this_golden_recordrocket_pizza_cutter/

Take care!

Expand full comment

Oooh! Oooh! I want one. Thanks!!

Expand full comment

Happy new year, Carolyn. And thanks for this series of articles. It's great to remember Cassini and your work.

Expand full comment

Happy New Year ! Loved the article

Expand full comment

thank you for a wonderful explanation,

and Happy New Year

Expand full comment

Great insight into the mission, showing us how important it is to look at things closer as we can only interpret some things from distance, thank you

Expand full comment

I love this article. Many thanks to you, Carolyn.

Expand full comment